
When I was little, I was convinced skyways were the way of the future. I became five years old in 1990 and bridges stretched across the sky between tall buildings everywhere I looked, from science fiction to real life. I was convinced these interstructural walkways would grow in number and complexity until–at last–denizens of our city would wend their way like a hamster through its tubes. Cap it all off with a dome or several and you had the arcology city of my fantasies.

Turns out the reality was much less romantic, and much more of a political struggle. Despite dreams of a walkable, interconnected city, most of what we got were pared-down in cost and effectiveness, leaving many to conclude the walkways to be more civic boondoggle in a city already plagued with boondoggle.
Most of the Skyway linkages that I stared up at in awe as a youth are now gone. Though they hanged on for some time, the razing of Midtown Plaza mortally wounded the Skyway system. I focus today on one of those vanished skyway bridges, but touch upon a couple more. So let us rewind to…
The 1950s
It’s the 1950s and two department store giants, Sibley’s and McCurdy’s, stand astride either side of Rochester’s East Main Street, forming a canyon of rivalrous retail. Holiday shoppers are forced to wait to cross East Main at the point of its heaviest traffic, meanwhile bearing the brunt of Rochester’s brutal winter squalls. In crossing they must struggle through the roadside slush to the neighboring retail establishment. Woe! How delicious, indeed, it would have been to stroll across a warm, enclosed footbridge and carry on shopping!
Thus it’s no surprise that the idea of a pedestrian bridge linking up the two titans across East Main Street was floated even back in this age, when McCurdy’s pet project Midtown Plaza was just a schematic drawing. Unlikely as cooperation between the two competing stores may have seemed, the boon to commercial pedestrianism was an obvious sell.

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-proposed-midtown/143374097/

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-midtown-plaza-mai/143374038/
With a simple concept sketch, a struggle spanning the next thirty years–and beyond–would begin.
The 1960s
Naturally, the bridge over East Main Street would disproportionately benefit Sibley’s department store, as it would draw from the entirety of Midtown Plaza’s traffic which, in turn, would draw from only Sibley’s. Therefore, McCurdy insisted the walkway would land directly in McCurdy’s store, as opposed to Sibley’s preference of a landing point within Midtown Plaza proper. Due to this sticking point, McCurdy’s blocked the project.
McCurdy’s had also made an agreement with the city that Cortland Street would be deeded to Midtown Plaza after its construction, to be roofed over, and explained that any such bridge would interfere with that plan.
In 1969, the city council pushed through an ordinance allowing construction of the bridge to move ahead.

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-council-final-act/143471529/

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-council-final-act/143471552/
Naturally, this move blindsided McCurdy’s and incensed them enough to bring suit against the city.
The 1970s
The ordinance by the “lame duck” Democratic city council allowing the bridge construction was quashed by the new 1970 Republican city council. Sibley’s, incensed in turn, brought its own suit against the city.

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-bridge-problems/143591493/
A second bridge project was allowed to go ahead: the curvaceous covered walkway between the Lincoln Tower [later the Chase Tower, today the Metropolitan Building] and Midtown Plaza over South Clinton Avenue.

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-not-part-of-main/143715117/

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-covered-walkway-f/143601393/

The “compromise” bridge over South Clinton Avenue, between Lincoln Tower [Chase Tower, Metropolitan Building] and Midtown Plaza.
The Sibley’s-McCurdy’s bridge was seemingly left for dead at this point.

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-sibleys-mccurdys/143692008/
Though proposals were still made including the potential walkway:

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-enclosed-mall-pro/145778157/

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-enclosed-mall-pro/145778479/
The 1980s: A Compromise Reached
And yet, as per Taylor Swift, “what died didn’t stay dead”: the bridge was alive. An unexpected agreement was at last made between the two giants, allowing the handshake across East Main to connect.




https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-skyway-agreement/143578329/
As one can surmise from the below map published in a 1982 issue of the Democrat & Chronicle, the city of Rochester had a far-reaching and complex plan for the development of the Skyway system of pedestrian bridges:

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-city-skyways/135406628/
Links were intended to form almost a spiderweb-like pedestrian walkway system among downtown buildings on the east side of the Genesee. A great number were built, many remain, and some never came to be. Some of them hint at intriguing possibilities.
One of these bridges, the still-extant footbridge linking the Sibley building to the Mortimer Street Garage, may have taken some focus away from the slow-moving negotiation process regarding the Sibley’s-McCurdy’s bridge.

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-eclipsed/143727284/

Mortimer Street Garage to Sibley’s pedestrian bridge.
https://catalogplus.libraryweb.org/?section=resource&resourceid=1115931739
Though the long-planned Sibley’s and McCurdy’s pedestrian bridge over seemed closer than ever, the great expense incurred by the unusual width and length of the bridge meant its construction continued to be delayed for some time.

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-wider-and-longer/143535289/

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-controversy-over/143586654/


https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-mccurdys-sibley/143594282/
It was in 1988 when the bridge was officially finalized. Reactions to the planned bridge were mixed, much as they were for other connections in the skyway system; however, as this was the first of three planned skyway bridges over East Main Street, the controversy was somewhat more voluble.

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-congratulations-o/143507053/
Though proponents of skyways appreciated the connected shopping centers and avoiding the cold weather, opponents bemoaned the disruption of historic views. Merchants at street level on East Main Street were especially voluble with their concerns, noting [fairly accurately] that decreased foot traffic would strangle their businesses while channeling customers into already successful high-end department stores.

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-controversy-about/143501131/
Is Sibley’s Even Staying?
There was another concern making the waters turbulent around the skyway linkage between McCurdy’s and Sibley’s, and I wrote it above. Was Sibley’s about to cut and run? Was it worth building a link between McCurdy’s and a large, defunct building?



https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-sibleys-intentio/143443508/
Gloomy portents included Sibley’s parent company putting the entire top half of the Sibley building up for sale:

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-top-half-for-sale/143663118/
1989: The Bridge Completed
The ribbon-cutting ceremony for the new bridge took place at ten in the morning on Thursday, July 27th, 1989. This was part of numerous events celebrating–somewhat prematurely–the completion of the “Main Street project” begun in 1986. Though work would not actually be completed until the winter, optics and events demanded a summer holiday for the celebration.

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-cleaning-skyway/143385268/

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-sibleys-mccurd/143392297/

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-mc-sib/143383730/
I am at a loss to comprehend Ethel P. Randall’s above complaint regarding the pedestrian bridge. Did she believe one was meant to use the bridge to cross at street level? It’s not a crosswalk. Chances are anyone using the walkway is already at the second level of one or the other store, which hardly seems like an unusual circumstance.
89-year-old Charlotte W. Johnson, below, took some umbrage with Ethel’s glib assertions, and rose to the skyway’s defense:

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-enjoying-the-new/143383499/
The 1990s
The year 1990 opened with whimper as Sibley’s did the dreaded thing and closed its East Main Street store, effectively shuttering one end of the expensive new bridge.

Newly-completed skyway bridge, left, in background of Sibley’s going out of business sale.
https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/money/business/2022/04/18/sibleys-prestigious-department-store-rochester-ny


https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-sudden-end-to-sib/143402735/

The Sibley’s-McCurdy’s pedestrian bridge from above.
https://catalogplus.libraryweb.org/?section=resource&resourceid=1115942652

The Sibley’s-McCurdy’s pedestrian bridge at street level, looking east. (bottom left). The empty supports for the Sibley’s sign are present.
https://catalogplus.libraryweb.org/?section=resource&resourceid=1115966400

A view east from inside bridge; a worker is on the Liberty Pole.
https://catalogplus.libraryweb.org/?section=resource&resourceid=1115920231

https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/modern-steel/archives/1961-1995/1990v01.pdf (pp.34-37)
The January-February 1990 issue of “Modern Steel Construction” magazine ran an article detailing some of the planning and construction process behind the bridge, which turned out to be a uniquely challenging construct. For one, though it was meant to match up with the cast-concrete pedestrian bridge over Clinton Avenue, Canadian suppliers were unable to guarantee the amount of prefabricated concrete necessary, increasing concrete costs and necessitating a greater proportion of steel construction for the footbridge.

https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/modern-steel/archives/1961-1995/1990v01.pdf (pp.34-37)


https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/modern-steel/archives/1961-1995/1990v01.pdf (pp.34-37)

The Sibley’s-McCurdy’s pedestrian bridge at street level, looking east.
https://catalogplus.libraryweb.org/?section=resource&resourceid=1116757757

https://youtu.be/5oxmYgNc-4Q

https://youtu.be/5oxmYgNc-4Q

https://youtu.be/5oxmYgNc-4Q

The Sibley’s-McCurdy’s pedestrian bridge at street level.
https://www.democratandchronicle.com/picture-gallery/lifestyle/2024/05/03/rochester-ny-history-a-look-at-life-here-in-the-1990s-180-photos/72842911007/
The 2000s
The walkway celebrated its first full decade of use just around the turn of the new millennium. The two great retail giants who had struggled so long to give birth to the bridge were both defunct, with McCurdy’s having shuttered its operations as of July 1994. Six years on from that, the bridge stretched between a Midtown Plaza which struggled to maintain tenants, and a Sibley building that suffered similarly.

The Sibley’s & McCurdy’s Skyway
The above image from Google Maps shows the skyway bridge in 2007, just prior to my own short tenure in the building. In 2008, a wall was built on the second floor inside the Sibley building as part of MCC Damon City Campus renovations. MCC art professor Kathleen Farrell was tapped to provide students to paint a mural on the wall, depicting Rochester history. I was one of those students, and throughout 2008 spent numerous days working on the mural inside No. 228 East Main Street. During off-times, I would sit by the Liberty Pole and observe my surroundings, often looking at the Sibley’s-McCurdy’s bridge and remembering my childhood visits to Midtown Plaza.

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-artwork-depicts-l/135514628/
Little did I know that in two short years, that selfsame bridge was doomed to be lost to posterity.
After a long history of being desperately wanted, badly unwanted, debated, celebrated, and ballyhooed, it’s sad that life would eventually prove to be so short for the Sibley’s-McCurdy’s skyway bridge. All the effort and money that went into this were met with almost a shrug–what’s the point of this? Are we even still doing the Skyway thing?
2010: A Skyway Grounded
At last the Midtown Plaza mall met its demise in 2010. No longer the burgeoning center of downtown commerce, the retail space was an echoing and empty reminder of bygone shopping. First to go was the skywalk:

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-skywalk-first-to/143647862/
Cut down, chunked up, and hauled off, the Sibley’s-McCurdy’s skyway bridge met its ignomonious end.

https://www.newspapers.com/article/democrat-and-chronicle-demolition-of-sky/143404889/
All that was left for several years was the arch-shaped scar of the former walkway cover, until a 2016-2017 renovation cosmetically patched the stone and brickwork, making it nearly invisible to the uninformed eye.
(Although I can tell. I have Eyes to See.)

The patched endpoint of the pedestrian bridge on the Sibley’s building.
Today
That brings us to today. Midtown Plaza lies empty, a fallow field of grass with an uncertain future. No skyway bridge punctuates the skyline. Thirty-five years after its construction, sixty-six years after its conceptualization, no sign remains that the bridge ever hung in the air above East Main Street. The only imprints remain on maps, photographs, newspapers, and our memories.

The former site of the Sibley’s-McCurdy’s Skyway
Supporting Gonechester
Did you enjoy what you read? Consider giving me a little tip at buymeacoffee.com/Gonechester, by way of saying “thanks!” It’s not necessary, but it certainly helps!








Leave a Reply